I 2nd this - I have gotten ‘rekt’ but staying in the pool long term is the plan for now… unless I offset my losses and reach a decision to pull out down the road.
if there was some incentive for long term hodling in this pool it would keep me in it for years
You are right, it is much better finished this program and use this 5% of rewards to incentivaze more new buyers, and then Badger can think in another BIP for early DIGG Holders in negative rebase.
The Real Diamond Hands, are the ones who supported the profits (rewards) of all the other initiatives (not now the rewards was changed) but before all Vaults Setts received DIGG rewards and we gift our money to them, XX% - 90% of our invests, I think that Badger DAO should rewards us. We are the real supporters for attracting people that see the awesome APY that included DIGG rewards.
And all people should know that the Real Diamonds Hands are DIGG Staked Holders not only LP WBTC/DIGG providers.
It is incredibly that people who staked DIGG has more “losts” that people who put LP WBTC/DIGG that has “Impermanent Losts”
The ratio is: People who Staked DIGG has 2X more losses than people who put LP WBTC/DIGG… really is more than 2X beacause the APY for staked DIGG (25% now) is minor than the APY for LP WBTC/DIGG ( 29% DIGG + 27% DIGG Vault Compounding)
Badger DAO should think in this factor for the rewards.
Disappointed that we’re barely seeing any engagement on this forum from devs or other stakeholders wrt the negative rebase issue. I guess they’re ok with people losing money.
It could be that most retail investors struggle to understand the concept or simply don’t know enough to contribute. I’ve seen some good content on Badger discord etc but it can get quite technical and some people may not be brave/have enough time to read the same article several times to fully understand it. Maybe having some very basic content for newbies would help. SFI have their academy which contributes to their stakeholders’ education. Just a thought…