CD #68 - Fund Association for Q4-2024
The performance of each treasury asset and the treasury as a whole must have clear accountability to allow future governance by BADGER token holders. The following is research by The Badger Association and The Badger Treasury Council.
TLDR; For Q4 2024 the Association operating budget is requested to be ~800k USDC (~500k reduction from Q2 and similar to Q3 request). The goal is to build on the momentum from the eBTC launch, create eBTC foundational growth and refocus on strategic planning to build future value through Treasury and Association collaboration.
Background
Overview of request to fund the Badger Association for Q4 2024:
Q4 DELTA vs Q3
No single line of the Badget represents more than 10% of the overall request.
Accounting for Q3 variances, the actual request in tokens is as follows:
Contractor Fees
100% of the Contractor Fees category is related to product development, software engineering, smart contract development, security and risk management, and the operations. Reduced due to less contractors this quarter.
Consulting Fees
BALCO, systems, and security costs. Main reduction areas are due to less auditing requirements.
Marketing Fees
Marketing fees have been dramatically reduced due to the priority for Strategic Planning from the Treasury and Association. Strategy will drive the go-to-market strategy.
Audit Expenses
Slightly lower this quarter in anticipation of development timelines. These are contractors such as Guardrail, Hypernative, Spearbit and so forth (security, web2 and web3 monitoring, and alerts).
Legal and Administrative Fees
Legal and travel are reduced. Legal expenses are optimized in anticipation of any potential requests or clarifications but may not be used entirely.
Product and Commercial Milestone
The following product initiatives were presented to the Treasury for approval and prioritization and the work will be signed off and determined for delivery based on continued collaboration between the Treasury and Association. Please note that not all of these initiatives will be developed in Q4 and are just recommendations waiting for approval.
- • steBTC V1.1
- • steBTC Lending Protocol Integration
- • Bitcoin Stability Module
- • eBTC Cross Chain
Technical development milestone
Web3
-
Support eBTC protocol with monitoring, alerting, and incident response partners
-
Provide technical advisory and execution for BALCO recommendations
-
Leverage Feature (waiting for:
-
3rd party participating from liquidator
-
General market conditions to improve
-
eth/btc ratio to improve)
)
- steBTC V1 (waiting on security review to release)
Web2:
-
Improvements to the eBTC App:
-
Mobile WalletConnect
-
Hypernative UI Security monitoring
Operational milestone - Execute transparency plan
The Association will continue to share Association insights provided through updates and reporting:
- Technical development progress against roadmap
- Product, operations and growth updates
- Financial performance (i.e. budget vs actuals commentary)
Implementation
- The Treasury will send 798,438 USDC to the Association payments multi-sig
Note - these numbers account for the Q3 variance (see above)
Metrics of Success
How long will the investment thesis take to play out?
This funding is for work to be done in Q4 by the Association. It is understood that some projects will require more than Q4 to be completed.
Will the treasury recoup funds or does the investment represent an outlay?
This investment is expected to bring a positive return on a longer time horizon as it will be essential in the continued growth of eBTC.
What are the risks associated with each investment?
- Protocol risk (0 - 10)
Likelihood of a smart contract or a system of smart contracts (protocol) is exploited or funds are lost
0 - These funds are being used to pay contractors and service providers. There is no protocol risk.
- Liquidity risk (0 - 10)
Liquidity risk refers to how easily an asset can be bought or sold in the market.
0 - Not Applicable.
- Market risk (0 - 10)
Market risk is the risk that arises from movements in stock prices, interest rates, exchange rates, and commodity prices. Metrics to consider : VaR, skew, sharpe.
0 - All of the funds are denominated in USD and paid with USDC.
- Credit risk (0 - 10)
The risk of loss from the failure of a counterparty to make a promised payment, this should cover airdrops expected
0 - There is no credit risk present in this decision
- Execution risk (0-10)
How long will it take to execute, how many signers on a Multisig or queue of things that must be signed first.
1 - This decision will require funds to be transferred between multi-sigs.
