Price action is content marketing, so?

We all said that ‘price action is content marketing’,
so the launch of eBTC seems that it is backed with $core , but not $badger?

1 Like

Good question!

Ive been following the launch of ebtc and too many questions already

From what I understand there are 3 fantastic opportunities with this project.

  1. nteroperability: By tokenizing Bitcoin into eBTC on Ethereum, users can seamlessly access both blockchain ecosystems, enhancing liquidity and utility.

  2. DeFi Access. eBTC enables Bitcoin holders to tap into decentralized finance (DeFi) opportunities on Ethereum, expanding their investment options and yield potential.

  3. Decentralized Governance. Operated by Badger DAO, the project employs decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) principles, empowering users to participate in governance decisions, ensuring transparency, and decentralization.

So I am a strong supporter of eBTC, and there is an amazing beneift potentially,
eBTC can expand the liquidity of BTC , users have a choice to lock in BTC rising profits and you don’t have to buy in ,
this is important especially while Wall Street monopolizes BTC market .

But now, it is rather puzzling than disappointing of $badger market ,
as a comparison , we should take a look at $core ,which is the direct competitor,
if it is true that ‘price action is content marketing’,
then , the price loss of $badger VS $core is the market loss of eBTC VS CORE ?

1 Like

I have seen this question on a number of platforms and it’s a fair question.

While price action can reflect market sentiment to some extent, it’s important to consider various factors beyond just comparing the price movements of two cryptocurrencies like Badger Dao and Core. Market dynamics, project fundamentals, community sentiment, and broader market trends all play significant roles.

Regarding recent developments, both Badger Dao and Core have been actively working on enhancing their platforms and expanding their ecosystems. Badger Dao has focused on integrating with various DeFi protocols to enhance its yield farming capabilities and improve interoperability within the DeFi space. Core, on the other hand, has been concentrating on developing its decentralized exchange (DEX) and expanding its utility through partnerships and integrations.

Analyzing the price performance alone may not provide a comprehensive picture of the market dynamics. Factors such as project adoption, technology advancements, community engagement, and market perception also heavily influence the price movements of cryptocurrencies. Therefore, while comparing the price action of BADGER versus CORE can offer insights, it’s essential to delve deeper into the underlying fundamentals and broader market trends to assess the overall market sentiment accurately.

Additionally, it’s worth keeping in mind why we back Badger! Core is good, but I’ve backed Badger for many years now.

Badger distinguishes itself from Core in two key ways:

1.Interoperability Leadership: Badger excels in fostering interoperability within the DeFi ecosystem, seamlessly integrating with various protocols and platforms. This approach enhances liquidity provision and yield farming opportunities, positioning Badger Dao as a pivotal player in the decentralized finance landscape.

2…Community-Centric Innovation : Badger prioritizes community engagement and governance, fostering a vibrant ecosystem of developers and users. Through decentralized decision-making and collaborative innovation, Badger continuously evolves to meet the changing needs of the decentralized finance space, ensuring sustained growth and resilience.