I agree that we IF we airdrop it should not be outside of the current BADGER ecosystem.
And if we do we should all be shouting this before DIGG launch
I agree that we IF we airdrop it should not be outside of the current BADGER ecosystem.
And if we do we should all be shouting this before DIGG launch
0 voters
digg ready? its 12th already
I really like the on point community the Badger has. From my side iād suggest to reward the BadgerDAO ecosystem - all stakers of Setts equally as they are all OG. Otherwise it might be good to talk to Curve guys in regards to cooperation - listing of DIGG/renBTC/wBTC in change of some DIGG rewards for Curve ecosystem.
Hi there,
I found out about badger when someone mentioned it on twitter in relation to āairdropā. Now Iām in(vested) since 2 days and really like the idea BADGER and DIGG.
I would also support the following statements:
Later on it would be nic to
thatās a good summary !
i think there should be 2 different distributions
this idea!
But what amount whould be choosen ? And from what part of the initially distribution should it be taken?
- 40% BadgerDAO treasury
- 40% Farming Rewards
- 5% Founding team
- 15% Airdrop (including Early Contributor Program)
Just thinking out loud, but maybe reduce all allocations except for the founding team by 1 to 2% and aggregate them for this purpose?
A lot of great ideas, just adding my 2 sats here : please explain clearly to newcomers when DIGG is launched what is elastic supply and how to deal with it. Iāve been in the AMPL community and that concept remains pretty mysterious to a lot of folks even now so the same questions arise every day.
maybe we can just make sure there is a decent minimum amount on the drop so even small stakers get a good allocation.
People are going to really struggle. The YAM info graphics are great but we need digg related versions. Id go so far as to suggest a competition for videos explaining it.
Iād just take it as a part of Airdrop allo and quantity up to the team. Just like @jonto is saying
Completely agree, those who sold their initial Badger airdrop should not be incentivized again with DIGG if they did not partake in the setts.
Taking the extra step to learn about BADGER and deciding to stake with the setts should be rewarded.
With DIGG being so scarce it would be nice to compensate those who took the time to learn about this project and participate further with the products offered.
Hey there,
Congrats on smooth launch so far !
Mentioning elastic projects, have you considered Based protocol ?
I mean, $BASED community is 3500 strong, they have deep understanding of elastic supply, so much that there is a compounding token already : $mbBASED.
$mbBASED is designed for deep culture interaction with partner projects : if you open a pool and/or launch āRoverā smart contract , you can expect an avalanche of memes, NFTs and full community support for $BADGER during a full year.
Based Protocol was fair launched and keys are burned. Today the community is mainly composed of artists and techs, our values seems to be close to yours, I believe we should get closer.
Sushiswap, Snowswap, AMP, Gods Unchainedā¦ More than 6 projects have already taken the initiative and joined Moonbase, it is a great opportunity to develop $BADGER with shared values and vision.
Here are couple of links to understand what $BASED / $mbBASED is all about.
based.fun
moon.based.money
rebase.radio
If you are looking to partner with elastic token that share $BADGE values, $BASED is way to go.
what qualifies as an āearly contributorā?
also sounds rebases are complicated, are there any resources yāall could share more resources to learn on rebase?
very familiar with BASED. would your suggestion then be to do a rover with DIGG? do they have any rovers that are also rebasing assets or would we need to lock it in a contract and do an erc20 representation? Definitely something we could put to the community to include or just use some of the DIGG treasury for if we think it will be good for the project. Also need someone sufficiently based to submit it.
I wonder what economic dynamics would play out if the 15% DIGG airdrop allocation was heavily weighted to the smaller addresses that claimed and staked their BADGER.
Since the larger holders would absorb most of the DIGG mined in the badger setts, I believe DIGG would be more evenly distributed across the community this way.
This could create interesting dynamics in the governance of Badger DAO, e.g., smaller addresses exchanging their DIGG to get more BADGER for greater influence in voting.
I believe there are plenty of badgers, especially smarter ones, that can come up with complimenting ideas to this distribution idea I propose.
Also any counterpoints are welcomed as I may be missing something and this distribution idea could be wishful thinking.
Complicated is a understatement
I believe you are one of the smarter badgers as I have seen you referenced on various posts.
What do you think of this idea?
I donāt know if this has been tried before in other DAOās.
Any input would be appreciated.
Thank you