I think the emissions proposed on above make sense and I’ve voted yes. Incentivizing greater liquidity for BADGER<>wBTC over the just BADGER sett makes sense based on the utility it provides.
I noticed in the Post DIGG emissions thread that it’s been proposed to have DIGG rewards for the DIGG sett be equal to about 60% of the emissions for the DIGG<>wBTC setts and I’m wondering if this is something we need to reexamine. In my mind, the DIGG<>wBTC pools are one of if not the most important features that will stabilize DIGG price.
Regardless of what is decided I will be LPing the sushi pool, but even were I planning on only depositing in the DIGG vault I believe it would be most beneficial overall to maximize the attractiveness of LPing DIGG<>wBTC
Cheers all, loving the collaboration going on!