# DIGG and BADGER Post DIGG Launch Week 1 Emissions

**URL:** <https://forum.badger.finance/t/digg-and-badger-post-digg-launch-week-1-emissions/817>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [December 18, 2020, 7:55pm UTC](https://forum.badger.finance/t/digg-and-badger-post-digg-launch-week-1-emissions/817 "2020-12-18T19:55:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 74

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr\_Po](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forum.badger.finance/mr_po/32/52_2.png) [@Mr\_Po](https://forum.badger.finance/u/Mr_Po)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2020, 9:11am UTC](https://forum.badger.finance/t/digg-and-badger-post-digg-launch-week-1-emissions/817/74 "2020-12-24T09:11:38Z")

</div>

@mason brought up a really good [topic to discuss](http://forum.badger.finance/t/bip-12-badger-emissions-week-4/1032/4) that I’ve had my reservations about since before the Badger launch: **the comparative underincentivization of liquidity locked in LP pools**.

This matter might be especially important in the context of the DIGG launch.

The metric I suggest to consider adjusting is the **reward per DIGG/Badger pooled** within the program.

Here’s how distributions would look if we were to reward the **same** amount for Badger and DIGG per liquidity pooled:

 ![DEMo V2](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/uploads/badgerdao/original/1X/7a7fd92736b2c85224d91ef3d69ac9c2b08c35c5.jpeg)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.badger.finance/t/digg-and-badger-post-digg-launch-week-1-emissions/817)._
