# BIP 35: Long-Term Core-Contributors

**URL:** <https://forum.badger.finance/t/bip-35-long-term-core-contributors/3006>\
**Category:** BIP | Badger Improvement Proposals\
**Created:** [February 8, 2021, 5:40pm UTC](https://forum.badger.finance/t/bip-35-long-term-core-contributors/3006 "2021-02-08T17:40:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 110

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![KZFlyer](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/forum.badger.finance/kzflyer/32/859_2.png) [@KZFlyer](https://forum.badger.finance/u/KZFlyer)\
**Post date:** [February 10, 2021, 1:59am UTC](https://forum.badger.finance/t/bip-35-long-term-core-contributors/3006/110 "2021-02-10T01:59:57Z")

</div>

> [@DeFiFrog](#):
>
> @Devin There will be a BIP in the coming days to redefine the parameters for quorum (increasing it from 40).
> 
> If there are no major objections, we will move this to snapshot Feb 9th. We currently have 130 votes for and 15 against this BIP.

You may want to add a 3rd option of “Needs more discussion” for times like this. I personally voted yes, because I do agree with the plan overall, but would have voted for more discussion. Pay is a touchy subject to begin with, and adding additional compensation or more complex payments, people get extra curious. 🙂

Maybe a BIP is needed to set some baseline HR type rules. Compensation plans, bonus structures, and eligibility criteria are a few that come to mind. Could speed things up if the vote was for “Onboarding NAME using NameofCompPlan @ $$$$ per year effective MM/DD/CCYY.”

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.badger.finance/t/bip-35-long-term-core-contributors/3006)._